|
Breakfast of Champions [Region 2] | ![Breakfast of Champions [Region 2]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51MVXWBFY9L._SL500_.jpg)
| Director: Alan Rudolph
Actors: Bruce Willis, Nick Nolte, Albert Finney, Barbara Hershey, Glenne Headly
Category: DVD
This item is no longer available
Rating:  70 reviews
Format: Pal
Languages: French (Unknown), English (Unknown), French (Subtitled)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Region: 2
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Running Time: 110 Minutes
EAN: 3384446003618
ASIN: B00004VYCR
Theatrical Release Date: April 21, 1999
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
Director Alan Rudolph's adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut's novel Breakfast of Champions centers on suicidal car dealer Dwayne Hoover (Bruce Willis), his drug- and television-addled wife Celia (Barbara Hershey), his cross-dressing sales manager Harry (Nick Nolte), his dim secretary and mistress Francine (Glenne Headly), and Vonnegut's alter ego of sorts, pulp writer Kilgore Trout (Albert Finney). Dwayne is desperate for meaning in his life and starts to believe that Trout, who has been invited to the town's impending arts festival, will be able to tell him some truth he's never heard before. The EPA is investigating toxic sludge under property Dwayne owns, Celia is losing her already fragile grip on reality, Harry is growing increasingly paranoid that Dwayne knows about his private habits, and Francine is impatient with Dwayne's increasingly erratic behavior. Meanwhile, Kilgore Trout grouses about his failures and finally decides to attend the arts festival as a final act of self-humiliation. On top of all this, there are four or five other characters, all eccentric to the point of overload. It's difficult to get a fix on what the movie wants to be about, but Glenne Headly makes her character an island of sympathy in the ocean of everyone else's self-absorption, and Albert Finney creates some poignant moments as Trout is confronted by people who either scorn or worship his stories without any attempt to understand them. Featuring a cameo by Vonnegut. --Bret Fetzer
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 65 more reviews...
 a horrible waste of talent, money, and my time March 15, 2009
Rockbassethound (southern california)
I have read a lot of accurate reviews here, i.e., the negative ones. There are not any elements of the film that succeed, other than technical ones, such as lighting and sound. Imagine all the effort, set design, practicing of lines, electricity, and people=hours in general that went into making this turd. As I said, a horrible waste.
 Great Movie February 15, 2009
Richard R. Poudrier
I read the book many years ago. Found the movie to be very good - brought back many memories of the book. Bruce Willis does a great job of playing a disturbing character.
 Yes, I Did Like This Movie September 22, 2008
Stanley Runk (Camp North Pines)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I'm not sure who the intended audience was for Breakfast of Champions. Mainstream comedy viewers would tuck tail and run from a film like this, while the Vonnegut fans will(and do) hate it because of the plot changes and missing elements from the book. So I guess that just leaves that small number of folks who like far out and bizarre comedies. Now, I personally don't like comedies just for the fact that they're odd, but I do have a fascination in seeing high profile actors doing things we hardly ever see them do. This came out at the right time coz Willis was hot from that Armageddon pile of sludge.
Breakfast of Champions is one of those films based on an "unfilmable" novel. We've seen this before in movies like Naked Lunch(mixed reviews from critics and Burroughs fans) and American Psycho(actually got favorable reviews). Doing Vonnegut is difficult coz his work is made for the book format due to his quirky and unique narration style. Naturally with a movie you pretty much lose that. One of the best things about Breakfast of Champions(the book) is that Vonnegut was the narrator and let the reader know that he was. He even puts himself in the story as a character! This is all lost in the film.
Plus there are indeed changes made to the story which seem totally unnecessary and certainly don't add to or clarify the story in any way. I can definitely see why Vonnegut fans did not like this movie. However, and I'm only guessing here, I think Vonnegut himself might have liked the offbeat and wacky tone of this movie. He does have a cameo in it as well.
Many folks have gone into the plot, so I won't waste too much time on that, but here's a little rundown: Duane Hoover(Bruce Willis) is a car salesman-a local celebrity everybody loves as though he were a movie star. He's going crazy. He doesn't know who he is or what his purpose is in life and he's off the deep end. He deals with a cross dressing salesman(Nick Nolte), a crazy fan who may want to take his place(Omar Epps), a pill popping wife(Barbara Hershey), and a son who is just about the worst lounge singer you've ever heard(Lucas Haas). Hoover thinks he might find some answers in Kilgore Trout(a reoccurring character in Vonnegut's novels), a failed Sci-Fi writer who has been invited to Hoover's town as part of an art festival.
That's really about it. The style of the movie is fast paced , cartoony, hallucinatory, and zany. Everybody in this movie acts insane, especially Nolte and Epps. Though the two films are quite different, I'd compare this movie to Fear and Loathing In Las Vegas as far as the tone and visuals go. I realize that this isn't a great adaptation of a great novel, and that everyone hated it. I do have to admit however ,judging strictly as a movie, I though it was pretty damn funny. It doesn't all work, but some of it is quite clever and just so odd that it's hilarious. Of course not everyone will agree with that, but humor is a very personalized thing. I think Nolte steals the show. I have never seen him act so crazy before and it's a trip to see him like that. Epps would be a close second for the same reasons. Albert Finney makes a good Kilgore Trout and Willis is passable enough as Hoover. He definitely has his moments too!
Watch at your own risk, coz this one is different to say the least.
I Lost My Breakfast June 6, 2008
Charles de Plume (Fullerton, CA)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
I don't even want to talk about it. I hope Nick Nolte got a fat paycheck for wearing that red negligee. Makes his infamous DUI mug shot look good. The one authentic scene is where Dwayne reads about "himself" in Trout's book. Everything else--and I mean everything--is just awful.
A Fabulous piece of cinematic surrealism January 25, 2008
Avrohom Leichtling (Monsey, NY)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Certain of the films Bruce Willis has appeared in definitely cross the line between tongue-in-cheek and out and out surrealism, in the sense of Salvatore Dali or Heironymous Bosch. The most well known of these is certainly "The Fifth Element" - a wonderfully droll comedy of ultimate destruction! It is only recently that I encountered "Breakfast of Champions" as a film although I had been through Kurt Vonnegut's novel previously. There is the tired argument about how film adaptations of literary works are either too literal or too liberal. Film making is not novel writing, and even though the latter may be based on the former, it has to stand on its own merits irrespective of its origins. In this case, however loose the adaptation of the novel, the film works on so many levels. The clue, of course, if the title which, for those of you old enough to remember, was the advertising phrase for the breakfast cereal, Wheaties. That's enough of a clue - the crass fantasy world of television advertising, the brittle surface veneer covering a maelstrom of emotional angst, the absurd juxtapositions, the reversal of character where the seemingly crazy loner becomes the hero, the tragic ending where release brings resolution in the mental hospital lockup for one character, and death by dissolution into the running fantasy notion of paradise for the other. The ending of the film is terribly jarring - even if you expect it. Insanity is like that, I guess.
For my money, it's a brilliant bit of film making. Perhaps the most jarring part of the illusion is Willis with a head of hair and thin, steel framed glasses!
This is not one for people who can only think in linear fashion - no fantasy, especially surrealism, operates that way. Too many people complained, for example about the third "Pirates of the Caribbean" - it was too complex, went in too many directions, had too much detail. Nonsense. Too much of our pop culture is single tracked hip-hop sterile. Just as in music there are more meters than 2 or 3, so too in literature, the visual arts and in cinema as well.
Bravo. Well done.
|
|
|
Proud member of the Celebrity Pro Network. Make sure you check out these other great CelebrityPro network sites:
Lyrics Database
Celebrity Blog
Celebrity Thing
Celebrity PC
Latest Celebrity Photos
Portal
Travel Photos
Quotes
Flash Games
|
Is there a better
price available?
Find out:
|
|
|
|
