Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines [Region 2] |  | Director: Jonathan Mostow
Actors: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Nick Stahl, Kristanna Loken, Claire Danes, David Andrews
Category: DVD
Buy New: $182.97
New (3) Used (3) from $23.15
Rating:  846 reviews
Format: Pal
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitles For The Hearing Impaired), English (Subtitled), Dutch (Subtitled), Hindi (Subtitled)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Region: 2
Discs: 2
Aspect Ratio: 2.40:1
Running Time: 109 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6
MPN: SBR 34144
EAN: 5035822414433
ASIN: B000062V8S
Theatrical Release Date: July 2, 2003
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
With a reported budget of $172 million, Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines starts in high gear and never slows down. The apocalyptic "Judgment Day" of T2 was never prevented, only postponed: John Connor (Nick Stahl, replacing T2's Edward Furlong), now 22 and disconnected from society, is being pursued yet again, this time by the advanced T-X, a sleek "Terminatrix" (coldly expressionless Kristanna Loken) programmed to stop Connor from becoming the savior of humankind. Originally programmed as an assassin, a disadvantaged T-101 cyborg (Arnold Schwarzenegger, bidding fond farewell to his signature role) arrives from the future to join Connor and his old acquaintance Kate (Claire Danes) in thwarting the T-X's relentless pursuit. The plot presents a logical fulfillment of T2 prophesy, disposing of Connor's mother (Linda Hamilton is sorely missed) while computer-driven machines assume control, launching a nuclear nightmare that Connor must survive. With Breakdown and U-571 serving as worthy rehearsals for this cautionary epic of mass destruction, director Jonathan Mostow wisely avoids any stylistic connection to James Cameron's Terminator classics; instead he's crafted a fun, exciting popcorn thriller, humorous and yet still effectively nihilistic, and comparable to Jurassic Park III in returning the Terminator franchise to its potent B-movie roots. --Jeff Shannon
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 841 more reviews...
 T3 June 23, 2009
David (Lima)
The movie is great, took some time to get in stock actually but the quality on blue is quite nice.
 terminator 3 June 21, 2009
Matthew S. Adamko (Maryland,USA)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
this has a lot more action than the other two previous movies and is another good science fiction hit
 Terminator 3: the one for total morons June 18, 2009
Jackflapsplikkitysplat (USA)
0 out of 2 found this review helpful
This movie is horrible, the casting is horrible, the script is horrible, everything about this movie stupid. I got angry watching it.
EDIT:
Ok I thought the above review was more than enough words to describe this dumb movie. I'm at a total loss, or was the last time I watched this which was the first hour a few days ago before I shut it off remembering how it ended and not caring. The script shows an astounding lack of creativity and imagination by being a simple retread of the first, well more like a very watered down weak moronic remake of part 2. The two young leads whose names I cannot remember are horrible actors, the Terminatrix is completely stupid, Arnold's last go as the T-800 is very cartoonish and he even seems to put emotion into his lines. This movie is a mess from the get go, very light and airy compared to Cameron's films, the guy is probably slapping his forehead each time a team of 2300032 screenwriters and producers get together and slop out another bastardization of The Terminator whether it be this and the other new film or that piss weak TV show. If you enjoy this you get what you deserve, idiot.
 A disappointment, the lack of relationships and the overwhelming power of the evil Terminator make it a weak three-quel June 13, 2009
Charles Ashbacher (Marion, Iowa United States(cashbacher@yahoo.com))
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This third installment of the Terminator series is a demonstration that a theme for a sequence of movies often simply expires from exhaustion after the third time. What made the second movie so entertaining beyond the special effects was the relationship between Arnold as the good Terminator and the young John Connor. The Terminator evolved into a father figure, sworn to protect John, willing to terminate in order to keep him alive. The bad Terminator was very powerful, yet had some vulnerabilities so that humans, particularly Sarah Connor, could join the battle. In this case the bad Terminator is so powerful that not even Arnold can stand against her for long. Although having a female Terminator was a welcome change from the previous ones.
In this movie, there is great action, but it dominates and it is action to cover up the lack of the good dialog and relationships in the first two movies. The high points are the references to the previous Terminator movies; the scene with the sunglasses is the best by far, although if you have not seen the first two versions, you will not see the humor in the situations. I found this movie to be a disappointment, the action is there but the previous movies also involved relationships that are lacking in this case.
Bad Casting Was Its Downfall June 11, 2009
Steven Stewart (steveo.stewart@hotmail.co.uk)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
The Terminator idea is something of great intrigue to me and although it may seem extremely farfetched and even a bit bizarre that I would believe such a thing, I do actually think a machine uprising is a possibility. We as a race strive to create more advanced machines every day; machines that are capable of independent thought and maintenance are just around the corner. There is no denying that if we continue to create more and more intelligent machines and rely more on the interweaving network systems we currently have in place, there will come a point, in my eyes, not too far in the future that machines will realise humans are obsolete and realise that no longer need us around. I know it's weird, but it's the way I think. I also think Scientology isn't as bizarre as the media would have us believe. Let's make one thing clear, I'm not a Scientologist or a recluse nerd, I just think in weird ways.
The original Terminator movie kicked off a truly brilliant series that lead to the triumphant sequel, subtitled Judgment Day. Nobody thought it could ever be topped and in many ways, with T3, they were right. It received quite critical reviews upon its original release and even had some people hating the very idea of making it a trilogy. Considering the age of Schwarzenegger, it was originally rumoured that he may not be able to be cast in this movie, and because of that rumour, the films production was condemned immediately. Luckily Arnie was able to participate in the movie, and actually got himself into shape and looking the way he did 10 years ago.
T3 is set roughly 10 years after the events of Judgment Day and now another enemy of the future is sent back to assassinate the leader of the future resistance against the machines, John Connor. Not only is it John now in the firing line, but it's also the other members of the resistance, including Johns future wife, Katherine Brewster. The new enemy is the most advanced Terminator yet. Known as the T-X or Terminatrix, this female Terminator, played by Kristanna Loken is the most brutal machine to date. She can create any weapon from her arms and just appears more heartless than any machine could possibly be. John is once again protected by a new T-101 (Arnie) and is told that the Judgment Day he thought he stopped was merely postponed and is actually inevitable. Now with the help of the new T-101, Katherine & John must keep away from the T-X and try to find her father who is heading Skynet to try and find a new way of trying the prevent the Rise of the Machines.
There is quite a bit that can be said negatively about this film, but there's also a bit of good to talk about as well. One of the biggest criticisms I have is the casting of Nick Stahl as John Connor. I don't mind Nick Stahl as an actor, but as the rebellious John Connor, he's simply not the right man for the job. I personally think Edward Furlong would have done a much better job had he reprised the role. I also felt that the absence of the Sarah Connor character was another big downfall for the third film as she's certainly a benchmark character for these movies, much like Arnold. Clare Danes as Katherine Brewster was just bland, I never found myself believing in the character and felt the film could survive without that character. I felt that she was simply a device to explain the plot of the Terminator history (or future, whichever way you see it) for the new viewers who may not have seen the original films. Kristanna Loken was triumphant as the T-X and for a female Terminator, I now can't think of anyone better for the role.
A few things within the film didn't make sense to me, but I can't talk about them because it will ruin it for those who haven't seen it. One thing that bugged me about it, however, was the whole idea that Judgment Day was inevitable. If that is so, then what was the purpose of blowing up Cyberdyne Systems in T2 to prevent Judgment Day when it's actually just a way of postponing it? The CGI within, is really well done and the chase scene in which the T-X is driving a giant crane which destroys almost an entire town, is possibly the best action sequence in many years of film. The effects involving the Terminators is also very well done, apart from the hand to hand fight scene which had great potential, but just ended up looking like a big budget slapstick comedy sketch.
The comedy moments are also a big downfall and dragged the mood of the film down to a ridiculous level. Thankfully, the doomsday mood was brought back through the immense action scenes and it managed to keep me entertained for the entire runtime. Flaws aside, it's a good addition to the series and although many loyal fans of the first two films may trash it, I enjoyed it and believe that those who have yet to see it should at least give it a chance.
|
|
|
