The Sum of All Fears [Region 2] |  | Director: Phil Alden Robinson
Actors: Ben Affleck, Morgan Freeman, James Cromwell, Ken Jenkins, Liev Schreiber
Category: DVD
Buy New: $5.43
as of 3/18/2010 18:03 EDT details
New (4) Used (3) from $4.90
Seller: moviemars
Rating:  314 reviews
Sales Rank: 230730
Format: PAL
Languages: Arabic (Original Language), English (Original Language), German (Original Language), Russian (Original Language), Ukrainian (Original Language)
Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Region: 2
Discs: 1
Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1
Running Time: 124 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.6 x 5.3 x 0.6
EAN: 5014437825735
ASIN: B00006AGH1
Theatrical Release Date: May 31, 2002
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
It's not easy replacing Harrison Ford as a beloved screen hero, but Ben Affleck brings fresh vitality to The Sum of All Fears, reviving Paramount's Tom Clancy franchise in the role Ford made famous. As CIA agent Jack Ryan, Affleck is a rookie in the covert ranks, unraveling a plot that lures Russian and American superpowers into a nuclear standoff, while a neofascist faction turns most of Baltimore into an atomic wasteland and holds the world in the grip of a terrorist nightmare. Affleck combines sharp intelligence with a new-guy's perspective, while a senior agent (Morgan Freeman) passes the torch of back-channel authority. The result is one of the best Clancy films to date, ably helmed by Phil Alden Robinson (whose comic thriller Sneakers was sorely underrated) with a stellar supporting cast, and adapted with abundant humor, humanity, and thrills by Donnie Brasco screenwriter Paul Attanasio and cowriter Daniel Pyne. Even the typically reticent Clancy would approve. --Jeff Shannon
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 314
 Nuclear Detonation January 16, 2010
Milkyway Movie Lover
This movie is a very rewatchable flick, one that has a unique little tidbit you dont see used in modern day movies that are realistic enough to keep you glued to the screen, it detonates a nuclear weapon in The United States! It's a truely pathetic and unfair slander against this fun movie that so many people gave it only one star merely because it was different from the book. I have news for these people, its a free country and there is no law that says anyone has to make a movie utterly cloned to what was in a book. Its perfectly legal to use our own creative talents and I even encourage people to use their gifts in such ways, after all, its how we get great poets and such by allowing free thinking. Perhaps those people would be happier living in a communist country. that said, the movie does have a few small things that I myself might have done better, but if its going to keep you from buying and watching this fun movie then you mustn't use sugar or salt etc. on any of your foods because it will change the flavor. I'm kidding of course, the point is, the movie is fine just how it is and we are all entitled to our opinions, but the movie is still a great flick which I watch at least twice a year, and I own over 2000 movies to pick from yet this one is a classic to me. I wont point out all the reasons because I hate spoilers, but if it wasn't such a great movie there wouldn't be over 300 reviews for it. I just wish they would make more movies that are this entertaining.
Certainly its a must have for the video library!
HISTORY OF A NUCLEAR WEAPON- November 26, 2009
drkhimxz (Freehold, NJ, USA)
Ben Affleck is a suitably young Ryan to match the fact that he is courting his future wife; Morgan Freeman, as always, is excellent. James Cromwell does well by the President although not always well served by the scriptwriter. There are thrills aplenty as we watch, knowing that an unexploded nuclear bomb has been discovered in the Golan Heights. Who has it? What will they do with it? Finding out provides its share of thrills as the film unfolds. By far, not of the first rank, but sufficient for an entertaining two hours.
After my brief comment I read some of the negative reviews. Taste for films varies by individuals, as it does for most cultural objects. I did not read the book, or if I did, it was too long ago for me to remember the plot, so I would not comment on the relationship of the screenplay to the novel. However, I am moved, as I often am, vigorously to disagree with the notion that one can translate a book into a movie as if each word projects an exact image on screen. Words on a page are words on a page, images on a screen are images on a screen, and never the twain will meet. Of course, some poorer novels are written essentially as screenplays so the film-maker has little trouble using them almost as is. Some movies take a highly literate book and fail because they do not make something new out it. I am entirely on the side of Fred Astaire, who insisted to a person who was being "portrayed" in one of his films, that regardless of what she and her husband had actually done, the film demanded something other than that to be successful. As one of our ages' best artists said of painting, if what is in a painting could be said in words, you have a lousy painting. Painting is for what cannot be communicated any other way. Amusingly, there is a line given to Larry Parks (as Jolson) in Jolson Sings Again, when he is supposed to be working with the writers on The Jolson Story, in which he tells them not to stick to the truth, but to make up a good story.
 High Expectation Met With....Question Marks. November 16, 2009
Nathan T. (SOMEWHERE)
I very regrettably asked my girlfriend to watch this movie with me.
This movie consistently boggles the mind, but not in a good way. You'll continuously refer to these questions listed below:
1. What's happening?
2. Who's that?
3. Where's this at?
and near the end..
4. What's in the friggin box?
5. What the..... ?
Everything is very anticlimactic, uninspired, and the story was unorganized and senseless in a lot of areas.
Good action, good camera angles, just horrible chops in the movie.
Whoever says this is a well made thriller or a good suspenseful film, I really don't know what to say to you. To each their own.
By the way, NEVER....EVER....believe in a movie trailer again!
Mediocre, even in Blu August 9, 2009
B. Lindsey
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I never understood the hate for Sum of All Fears. It's not a super intelligent drama, or an inspiring story of someone losing and finding themselves amidst the horrors of nuclear winter-but it doesn't try to be. Sum of All Fears is-as the box describes it-an action-packed thrill ride, and it succeeds damn well at doing that.
Serving as a reboot for the Jack Ryan franchise, Sum of All Fears stars Ben Affleck as Jack, and Morgan Freeman as CIA director William Cabot. Right from the first moment the two are on screen together you can see the chemistry they shared, and it stays throughout, making one of the more enjoyable non-obvious pairings in recent action films.
So yeah, the two stars carry the film with their acting, but what about the rest of it? It's not perfect, but it's still great. Sum was the first of many series reboots in the 2000s, paving the way for Bond, Batman, and others. With a grittier, more realistic down-to-earth Jack Ryan, director Phil Alden Robinson tried to make the series more realistic in today's world, and to an extent he succeeded.
This Jack Ryan isn't the one we see in the 80s and early 90s films; he's more like us. Unfortunately, by the end of the movie Super Jack is back, and whereas we once had a guy who couldn't even remember to wear a tie to work or know how to act in the field, suddenly we have a guy singlehandedly staving off a nuclear holocaust without much trouble at all. It's a big jump from point A to B, and that's where the film starts to spiral down a bit - especially after the realism of the nuclear blast. (Don't worry, it's not a spoiler at all; they make it pretty obvious on the cover that a nuclear bomb goes off.)
In the end, The Sum of All Fears tries its hand at one approach, succeeds until the bomb goes off, and then seems to say "Screw it!" and goes back to being a traditional CIA action flick. Can I fault it? Not really, because even though the tone and style shifts suddenly, it's still a damn good ride any action fan will enjoy.
Content - 4/5
Sum has long been a guilty pleasure of mine. It's got just enough in it to make it more intelligent than traditional Hollywood action flicks, but it has just enough in common to make it enjoyable time and time again.
Video - 2.5/5
What you get depends entirely on your set-up. For most people, Sum looks fantastic. Presented in 2.35:1 widescreen and in 1080p, and being a new film, things should look fantastic. And sometimes (on mid-range or smaller TVs) they do. But once you get up to the big screens and truly run 1080p in its full glory, you notice a lot of over-processing. Some scenes look great, and twenty seconds later you'll wonder if you're watching a directors cut with a spliced in cutting room floor take.
Grain is also an issue in the latter half of the movie, oddly, which is when there's the most dust and clouds to make it noticeable. On the bright side, the blacks are nice and dark throughout, no matter which size or resolution you're viewing it in.
Audio - 4/5
With a TrueHD 5.1 track, you know what you're going to get. The first half of the film the TrueHD does little to impress, as there's little going on; on some occasions I even had to turn up the sound. Once the action kicks in about halfway through, however, sounds start bumping. The surround sounds fantastic, and scenes like the bomb going off are especially worth mention.
Replay - 2.5/5
You can watch it again and still get some enjoyment, but chances are you'll have to wait a while. There's only so much Ben Affleck a person can take without entering insanity; Morgan Freeman does cancel that out a bit, but the slow pace of the first half of the film makes it difficult to watch after you've recently seen it.
Extras - 2.5/5
Other than two easily predicted featurettes, Sum sports two commentaries, both by director Phil Alden Robinson: one with Tom Clancy, one with cinematographer John Lindey. The commentary with Lindey is very interesting if you're interested in the technical aspects of film making or aspiring to be a director yourself, but fairly boring for those just watching movies. The Clancy commentary is really entertaining, especially when Tom starts getting into where he feels the film falls short and what it failed to bring over from the book. A few awkward moments of silence round out an overall enjoyable commentary track, but unfortunately it's just about the only worthwhile feature on the disc.
Overall - 3/5
As a movie, The Sum of All Fears is a great popcorn film, and one of the better (if not one of the more underrated) action movies of its year. It's not going to make you think too long and hard, but it's an enjoyable ride with a stellar cast. Unfortunately, with the hiccups in video presentation, the lack of good extras, and the knowledge that this is most likely the last we'll see of this particular Jack Ryan universe, it's a very mixed ride - even if it is thrilling while it lasts.
 Good plot, good film, hedious adaptation May 27, 2009
Anibal Madeira (Lisboa Portugal)
Tom Clancy knows how to make vivid and realistic stories, because he walked in the halls of power and really understands about politics, the military and secret services. "The sum of all fears" is no exception, and shows how a determined partie with the right connections can begin a series of events that leads to a war with dire consequences. This film, although changing lots of plot, character and faction elements, keeps the main substance of the novel: Fear will tear us apart.
Especially in europe we believe that we live in a state of grace and permanent peace, but it's so fragile that we must cherish it. This film and novel is really a cautionary tale.
This Jack Ryan is a freshman in the CIA, not the hardened sub-director we're used to, and Ben Affleck fulfills the role quite well. Morgan Freeman is great as a top CIA executive; charismatic and with great leadership characteristics, easy stuff for such a good actor.
Secondary roles like the russian president and the american operative are also well played, leaving their mark.
The story itself as some "reality checks", like the secret services almost omnipotence, a walk in post nuclear bomb Baltimore, total discardance of nuclear Electro Magnetic Pulse (although the commentaries of Tom Clancy state that a small weapon probably would not knock out the entire network of com nods) or the fist fight with the big nazi (why????).
Good entertainment with a message. Common sense and wisdom must always be present in politics, especially when we have weapons that can destroy us all.
The extras in the DVD are quite good; explaining how was done the main scenes that required most special fx (like the effects of the explosion, or the A4 being shotdown); there are also interviews with the actors, and great commentaries from Tom Clancy (don't forget to watch this film a second time with the commentaries on - they should have hired Mr.º clancy as an adviser...the film would be better). Three stars for the extras.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 314
|
|
|
