Napoleon (TV Miniseries) (2-Disc Standard Edition) |  | Director: Yves Simoneau Actors: Christian Clavier, Isabella Rossellini, Gerard Depardieu, John Malkovich, Anouk Aimee Studio: A & E Home Video Category: DVD
This item is no longer available
Rating: 43 reviews Sales Rank: 213294
Format: Box Set, Closed-captioned, Color, Dvd, Ntsc Languages: English (Original Language), French (Original Language) Rating: NR (Not Rated) Region: 1 Aspect Ratio: 1.33:1 Number Of Discs: 2 Running Time: 480 Minutes Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2 Dimensions (in): 7.1 x 5.4 x 0.6
ISBN: 0767055497 UPC: 733961709179 EAN: 9780767055499 ASIN: B00008V2TV
Theatrical Release Date: 2003 Release Date: April 29, 2003
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com One of the Great Lives gets the full-scale miniseries treatment in this lavish international co-production (which aired on A&E). Even at a six-hour running time, there's barely room for all the extraordinary twists and turns of Napoleon Bonaparte's turbulent career as Emperor of France, from his brilliant early military victories after the Revolution to his megalomaniacal attempts to reign over all of Europe. While there are battle scenes galore, and court ceremonies staged with eye-popping pomp and circumstance, this production keeps returning to the intent, watchful face of Christian Clavier's Napoleon. The hawk-eyed, pint-sized actor appears born to play the role, and he draws out the humanity within the icon. Clavier dominates the film, although Isabella Rossellini's Josephine is heartfelt enough to convince you of the passion between these two, which later turned into a kind of pragmatic contract. (Hard to keep your love life straight when you're trying to rule the world.) John Malkovich, in his exquisite-decadent mode, provides amoral political advice as Talleyrand. Napoleon has the usual problems of international moviemaking, including the toneless line readings of supporting actors and the patchwork of accents. And it must move from A to B to C in predictable fashion, the curse of the historical biography. Abel Gance's silent epic Napoleon remains the cinematic standard for this life, but A&E's version gives a satisfying dramatic overview. --Robert Horton
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 38 more reviews...
Not up to "Band of Brothers" March 18, 2009 Peacenik (Campinas, Brazil) 1 out of 2 found this review helpful
This series is called a "Super Production". But the inferiority of Directing technique and Directing talent between Yves Simoneau and Spielberg & Hanks is abysmal. To deserve a 5 star this series would have to be as good or better than Band of Brothers, or Saving Private Ryan. Or better than the 1970 film Waterloo, with Rod Steiger, Christopher Plummer, Orson Welles, and Jack Hawkins. The acting is sometimes atrocious, some of the secondary characters just "say" their lines, they don't act.Christian Clavier as Napoleon is not convincing, he lacks the "Esprit", the Rage, the Drive the real Bonaparte had. He just acts, does not wear the whole personality of Bonaparte. The battle scenes are horrendous, soldiers just throw their arms and "die" - their Special Effects guy is still in the 1950's. Compare to the battle scenes in Band of Brothers and Saving Private Ryan, and the gulf is absolutely enormous. The sequence of scenes is also loosely tied - here I have to admit it is not the Director's fault but the Producer's - Napoleon's life should NEVER be tried to be shown in 4 hours, the man is so complex, his life so full of adventures, of ups and downs, of heroism and crookery (he brought back from Italy 248 carriages full of works of art to the Louvre, later taken back after his defeat at Waterloo). His life should be told in not less than a Band of Brothers length - 16 to 20 hours. But even comparing it to WATERLOO the 1970 film it is much inferior. Rod Steiger is a real Napoleon, and C. Plummer excels in Wellington - if you want to feel Napoleon and his people, if you want to see literally thousands and thousands of extras in the battlefield, with helicopter taikes showing the battleground, go see Waterloo. On the "Army", again this production is shallow, an "Army" is represented by 20 or 30 soldiers, like in Egypt, on the dunes, you only see about two dozens of soldiers - for God's sake, in Bands of Brothers they just used computers and "multiplied" 20 soldiers to seem like thousands, and this technology was fully available when this series was filmed. So don't expect to see big Armies, lots of Extras, etc. It clearly is a cheap production, despite the comment of another Amazon client that they used 3 old carriages - ok, but how about soldiers? No Armies. I honestly don't recommend buying this, it's a waste of money, doesn't grip you, doesn't explain the man, and surely doesn't put you in the past. It's like watching a Theater Play, with bad actors - only J. Malkovitch is convincing, as usual.
Locations? March 2, 2009 T. Miller 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
If anyone knows the name of the building that they used for the Tuileries Palace, please email me. This palace was destroyed in 1871 and some of the interior rooms are actually in Versailles.
This film neglects meaningful history September 30, 2008 anonymous 1 out of 3 found this review helpful
This film is more like a soap opera than a history movie. It heavily focuses on a few relationships but badly neglects why the countries were fighting, what reforms Napoleon was making, and why Napoleon was such a great commander. You will learn far more watching the one hour documentary about Napoleon in the History Channel DVD *The Conquerors.* It shows how much this film leaves out.
Great! March 30, 2008 Stefano Sguazzini (Novara, Italy) 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Great reconstruction, amazing costumes, very good international cast. Everything's good except Claviere english....but Napolean is french, isnt he?
L'empereur de la France March 21, 2008 Kendra 6 out of 6 found this review helpful
Napoleon is a gorgeous, lush, and vibrant cinematic feast. It's stunning to watch and reminds me of the earlier films filmed in full Technicolor. The colors are vibrant and over-saturated at times. It's definitely a visual masterpiece. I bought my version from a Chinese seller on eBay. The version I watched is 8 hours in length and in English with a choice of dubbed Chinese audio or the English audio. I've noticed that many reviewers have complained about the English dubbing on the English version and mention that one should purchase the French version with English subtitles. I'm very confused about this, really, because my version wasn't dubbed English. I realize they didn't film two entirely separate films, however the version I owned is filmed in original English and my husband and I agree we cannot possibly be mistaken about this. We expected dubbing, but there was none. Every single word was enunciated clearly and was absolutely in sync with the actors' mouths. In addition, the English version I watched had no narration as some of these reviewers noted negatively. I had never even heard of Christian Clavier prior to seeing this film. He was incredible. He seemed born to play this role. Clavier's face is amazingly expressive and he brings sensitivity and empathy to his part. At times I got so caught up in the character and appeal of Napoleon that I found myself dreading the Moscow scenes and then the scenes at Waterloo-- futilely hoping for a different outcome. I've learned that this actor usually plays more comedic roles and I'm surprised since he's wonderfully talented. Joining Clavier is Anouk Aimee as Napoleon's mother, Isabella Rossellini as Josephine, John Malkovich as Talleyrand, and Gerard Depardieu as Joseph Fouche. Anouk Aimee was perfect-- she definitely brought some depth to Letizia. Both Isabella Rossellini and John Malkovich, though, were really horrible. Josephine was known to be unfaithful and headstrong. Here, we wonder what Napoleon actually sees in her! I don't want to blame this actress completely-- the script could have definitely used some improvement when it came to their interaction. However, she brought no charm to the role of Josephine at all, I thought. Had Josephine been played by Marie Baeumer (who played Napoleon's sister, Caroline), Mavie Hoerbiger (Marie Louise of Austria, Napoleon's second wife), or Alexandra Maria Lara (Countess Marie Walewska), we would have all fallen in love with her. But, instead, we were given a flat performance lacking in appeal. John Malkovich played John Malkovich playing Talleyrand. I don't think I've ever seen him play a role any differently than he played here. Just like Jack Nicholson is known for being wild and erratic, John Malkovich is known for his flat affect and cold demeanor. Additionally, it was a bit off-putting to have Talleyrand speak with absolutely no trace of a French accent, but there you have it. It seemed as if the casting directors took no real note of this when casting- having the names that would draw both the French and the Americans must have been their main concern. John Malkovich wasn't the only one who didn't even attempt to speak with an authentic accent. Julien Sands, (who played Klemens Metternich, the ambassador from Austria) spoke the King's English. Having accents match the characters would have been a bit more helpful, especially when dealing with unfamiliar characters from so many different countries. And although Napoleon was actually from Corsica, his French accent didn't bother me at all. He at least was French (even if originally from Corsica) and, really, he lived in France from age nine. He very well could have lost his Corsican accent (his mother, however, was decidedly French). So, some of that was a bit strange. Napoleon's speech was beautiful but his own brothers sometimes sounded American. His stepdaughter didn't sound French, his second wife didn't sound Austrian. Where's Meryl Streep when you need her? Everyone else was very good. Gerard Depardieu actually gets better with age. I've always liked him, but didn't understand his very wide appeal. He was excellent and stole the scenes when on screen. As noted by so many other reviewers, there are obvious inaccuracies and omissions. Thankfully, my husband (a historian) was right there next to me and I was able to ask him questions when things weren't clear. The transitions from scene to scene are poor and fail to give the viewer ample background and information. Some text would have been helpful between scenes-- especially either prior to major battles, for instance, or afterwards. Still, with all the film's faults, it was enjoyable and informative (even if it could have been more informative), and Christian Clavier was superb. As an addendum, when this film was made, there was only speculation regarding the cause of Napoleon's death. He believed he was being poisoned and suffered horrible pain during his last months. However, only last year it was discovered that Napoleon actually died of gastrointestinal bleeding due to gastric cancer. Edited to add: I just confirmed that this version is NOT dubbed, despite reports to the contrary! In fact, the English version was dubbed into French, not the other way around. And, although the French version has a longer running time than the narrated English version, this particular Chinese import version (with no narrator) runs the same length as the French version.
|
|
|