Wuthering Heights (1992) |  | Director: Peter Kosminsky
Actors: Juliette Binoche, Ralph Fiennes, Janet McTeer, Sophie Ward, Simon Shepherd
Studio: Paramount
Category: DVD
Buy New: $42.44
as of 2/10/2010 03:36 EST details
New (5) Used (5) from $32.50
Seller: garcorp
Rating:  153 reviews
Sales Rank: 17954
Format: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD, Widescreen, NTSC
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitled)
Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Region: 1
Number Of Discs: 1
Running Time: 105 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.4 x 5.3 x 0.6
MPN: PARD325334D
ISBN: 0792186621
UPC: 097363253341
EAN: 9780792186625
ASIN: B0000AUHPK
Theatrical Release Date: 1992
Release Date: December 2, 2003
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The classic and tragic love story of Cathy and Heathcliff.
Genre: Feature Film-Drama
Rating: PG
Release Date: 2-DEC-2003
Media Type: DVD
Amazon.com
Peter Kosminsky's 1992 adaptation of Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights goes to the extreme of casting Sinéad O'Connor in a brief bit as Brontë herself, but the film still doesn't approach the accomplishment of William Wyler's classic 1939 production (with Laurence Olivier and Merle Oberon) or subsequent versions by Luis Buñuel and Robert Fuest. That doesn't make it unwatchable, however: it still offers The English Patient costars Ralph Fiennes and Juliette Binoche as doomed lovers Heathcliff and Cathy. Binoche is a bit washed-out, but Fiennes makes a strong impression as the rejected laborer who makes his fortune and exacts a vengeance. Unlike Wyler's film, this one covers all the chapters of Brontë's book, but it is sodden with misery and lacks all grace. --Tom Keogh
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 153
Ambitious adaptation - Fiennes' smoulders as Heathcliff January 7, 2010
z hayes (plano,texas)
This 1992 adaptation of Bronte's classic novel is directed by Peter Kominsky and is most notable for his attempts to interpret the entire novel on-screen. Here, both the second generation of Earnshaws and Lintons are portrayed, and it is also interesting that the director chose to cast Juliette Binoche in a dual role, as Heathcliff's tortured love, and also her own daughter. Though this version has suffered at the hands of critics and purists alike, I consider this one of my favorite adaptations of "Wuthering Heights", mainly because of Ralph Fiennes' credible characterization of the tortured anti-hero. Heathcliff is such a complex character and one not easy to like, considering the cruel and callous way he treats those around him, even manipulating his own son for his twisted notions of revenge. But, despite all this, Fiennes' portrayal invites our sympathy - his deeply rooted love for Cathy and his insurmountable grief at losing her is so credibly conveyed that one can't help but sympathize with him and understand his motivations, however misguided they may be. The movie is beautifully filmed with stunning cinematography, and the score suits the somber storyline. This may not be considered a classic adaptation of Bronte's masterpiece, but it certainly was compelling for me.
 "I Cannot Live Without My Soul." The Immortal Love Story Is Here For The First Time In ALL Its Glory. October 23, 2009
HAMLET
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
For the first time ever, Emily Bronte's classic story of love and revenge gets the royal, full-length treatment. Ralph Fiennes & Juliette Binoche, then unknown, play the doomed lovers Heathcliff and Cathy. Very well made movie. The performances are much better than in the crappy 1970 movie version of this story, which was destroyed by a riduculous screenplay (not to mention also the utterly nonsensical ending). The chemistry between Fiennes and Binoche is very apparent, and sparks fly between them. As I haven't read the novel in several years (and given that this one tells the COMPLETE story), I got lost during the 2nd half of the film, but continued watching with absolute fascination...only towards the end did I begin to grasp the rest of the story. After seeing Fiennes in this movie, Steven Spielberg wanted Fiennes for the role of the villainous Amon Goeth in "Schindler's List"... and the rest is history. To see Fiennes go from playing a tormented hero to an evil man with no shred of human kindness is extraordinary. Binoche is doubly excellent in the movie. Sophie Ward, who plays Isabella Linton, also appeared as the ill-fated Elizabeth in "Young Sherlock Holmes." Best to watch the 1939 film version with Merle Oberon & Laurence Olivier first. Also a very good version. I highly recommend this movie. Rated PG.
Wuthering Heights October 16, 2009
Sandra W. Sidden
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I loved this movie as a youth, And now own it on DVD, I love just as much now as I did when I was that youth who watched it the,
 epic but limp September 18, 2009
mr. critic (lake city, fl)
i admit getting all this into a short film is a huge challenge. the main problem is casting. catherine is supposed to be more sinister, haughty, mean, clever. heathcliffe should be tougher, manlier, angrier. the book told the servants' lifestyles and feelings...little of that here. the stark landscape is great. would it have killed the director to use it more to show space, distance, lonliness? headley grange is far too fancy. i wanted to see more early toxic family life and the bent natures of envy, greed, lust just prior to the lintons. in this movie heathcliffe and catherine grow darker. in the book they were dark even as children. that's what made the story unique.
 Too much of an over-scripted love story... July 14, 2009
Andrew Raker (PA)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Overview:
Film is heavy on narration, with a female narrator. The narrator allows a large amount of action to be told rather than experienced. Additionally, the film is rather cheesy. Furthermore, this adaptation emphasizes the love story between Catherine and Heathcliff.
I recommend the 1998 Masterpiece Theatre adaptation. Below, I have listed some points of comparison/contrast to show why I think the 1998 is better.
1.
Nelly's character is much better developed in 1998 adaptation. In fact, minor characters are overall better developed in 1998 adaptation.
2.
Heathcliff appears more sincerely distraught in 1998 adaptation. He appears more insane in 1992 adaptation.
3.
Class and historical, time-sensitive issues are covered better in 1998 adaptation than 1992 adaptation (ex: Catherine's desire to marry Edgar for money. Heathcliff's desire to have Catherine II marry Linton so he could obtain Thrushcross Grange).
4.
1998 adaptation shows the story better by visual sequences rather than just a narrator's voice. In other words, the 1998 adaptation is more interesting than the 1992 adaptation.
5.
1992 adaptation does keep two points that the 1998 adaptation does not. (1) It keeps the beautiful/stormy weather scene, and (2) The scene where Catherine tells Heathcliff that if he kisses her again, she will die.
6.
1992 adaptation is 16:9 aspect ratio. The 1998 adaptation is 4:3 ratio. Therefore, the 1992 adaptation has the better picture quality for most wide-screen televisions.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 153
|
|
|
