Wonderland |  | Director: James Cox
Actors: Val Kilmer, Lisa Kudrow, Kate Bosworth, Christina Applegate, Josh Lucas
Studio: Lions Gate Films
Category: DVD
List Price: $14.98
Buy Used: $0.92
as of 3/20/2010 14:56 EDT details
You Save: $14.06 (94%)
New (8) Used (77) Collectible (3) from $0.92
Seller: superpawn
Rating:  105 reviews
Sales Rank: 41371
Format: Anamorphic, Color, DVD, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled)
Rating: R (Restricted)
Region: 1
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Number Of Discs: 1
Running Time: 104 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.4 x 0.5
ISBN: 1594351287
UPC: 031398113447
EAN: 9781594351280
ASIN: B00014K58W
Theatrical Release Date: October 24, 2003
Release Date: February 10, 2004
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
The dark underside of Boogie Nights is tracked in Wonderland, a sleaze-filled look at the notorious "Wonderland Murders" of 1981. The movie attempts to explain how the legendarily endowed porn actor John C. Holmes was involved in the killings, while deliberately suggesting the difficulty of knowing the truth of a murky case. The police procedural aspects turn out to be less intriguing than the weirdly hapless domestic life of Holmes (Val Kilmer at his most dazed), who despite his promiscuity continues to rely on his starchy, clean-cut wife (an unflattering role for Lisa Kudrow, but the most interesting character in the picture). Well-known actors--notably a near-unrecognizable Dylan McDermott--slouch through the story, which rather distracts from the aggressively realistic approach. In the end, the unclean aura makes one yearn for the stylized ingenuity of Boogie Nights, or at least a reason to be watching this story this way. --Robert Horton
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 105
 Under-appreciated, flawed, reminiscent of good Friedkin January 25, 2010
Michael K. Crowley
WONDERLAND has many qualities to recommend it, including a unique style that is reminiscent of Friedkin's TO LIVE AND DIE IN LA, several superb performances, most obviously Val Kilmer's portrayal of John Holmes.
This film successfully captures the fright, the decadence, and the horror of that intersection of porn, narcissism and narcotics that was so hard to ignore in the Hollywood of the 80s.
A brave film--I put this in the same category with CHAPTER 27 as a bold film that everyone thought nobody should ever make because it touched on or overtly violated an unspoken taboo.
The scenes involving detectives trying to put the puzzle together are weak but common structural devices, and the cops are competent enough that these scenes are not silly.
The heart of the film involves the depiction of the sordid world of John Holmes and his sacrificial girlfriend and ex-wife.
In my opinion, this was a very underrated, underappreciated movie with guts, passion and insight.
 "Provocative" August 22, 2009
Terry Richard (Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
"Wonderland" depicts the events that happened on Wonderland Avenue in Los Angeles during the summer of 1981 in which legendary porn star John Holmes was embroiled in a vicious multiple murder. By the turn of the eighties Holmes was a drug-ridden cocaine adddict who found himself washed-up as a porn actor. No longer in demand by adult studios for work due to his drug problem, Holmes started stealing and robbing from people to feed his habit. He also got himself involved with a bunch of shaddy characters in the drug trade. Eventually, things continued to spiral downward for Holmes as he was involved with the multiple murders of people at a house on Wonderland Avenue. Holmes insisted emphatically that he didn't perform the killings, but the film leaves the door open as to whether or not Holmes knew who did. Val Kilmer (who plays Holmes) does a good job in playing the porn king, but I only wish the film would have dealt more with Holme's life starting with his start in the adult film industry to his demise from AIDS in 1988. The filmakers could have done so much more with John Holme's lifestory. An even greater film than "Wonderland" is 1997's "Boogie Nights" starring Mark Whalberg playing a character based on Holmes. In that film we see how a young man enters the porn business and how his introduction to drugs nearly destroys him. Also, if you can find the two disc set of "Wonderland" grab it although I don't see any available on Amazon. That set contains a very informative documentary on John Holme's life called "Wadd: The Life And times Of John C. Holmes" and it's even better than "Wonderland" as people who knew Holmes is interviewed including his ex-wife.
 Interesting But Flawed Account of the Notorious Wonderland Murders November 28, 2008
Gary F. Taylor (Biloxi, MS USA)
6 out of 6 found this review helpful
In the 1970s, when pornographic movies became increasingly available to mainstream consumers, John Holmes (1944-1988) parlayed his supersized endowment into stardom. Those who knew him well describe him as likeable but somewhat dim; when his stardom began to fade he had nothing on which to fall back, and he became just another drug-addicted has been, trading on what was left of his dubious celebrity for a line of cocaine here and a line of cocaine there. In 1981 Holmes tended to bounce between big-time drug dealer Eddie Nash and a group of smaller-time dealers who lived on Wonderland Avenue in Los Angeles--and found himself greatly over his head.
Police described the Wonderland murder case as the most gruesome murder scene since the 1969 Manson family killing spree. Although theories differ in details, they are consistent in outline: Holmes set up Nash for robbery by the Wonderland dealers; Nash responded by having Holmes set up the Wonderland dealers for a mass hit, carried off by people weilding pipes. Four people died, one survived with serious injuries and without memory of the attack. The 2003 film WONDERLAND attempts to portray both the crimes and the conflicting stories that Holmes, Nash, a Wonderland insider, and others gave during the course of the investigation.
Val Kilmer is unexpectedly convincing as the whining John Holmes, unable to focus beyond the next score, coming up with one silly idea after another. Lisa Kudrow is particularly memorable in the role of Holmes' estranged wife, Sharon; Kate Bosworth equals her as Holmes' current girl, Dawn Schiller. Although the movie is littered with cameos that actually tend to distract--Paris Hilton and Carrie Fisher, among others--the supporting cast is also quite fine. But the script, editing, and overall concept lets them down: it begins well and finishes well, but the middle portion of the film is weak and the overall movie lacks emotional or psychological depth.
WONDERLAND's characters are not likeable, and director and co-writer James Cox doesn't even attempt to find a means of bringing us inside their heads and lives in a way that makes them understandable, much less sympathetic. The film instead attempts to jump from character to character and idea to idea while also sliding back and forth in time--and in the process never quite stays in one place long enough for you get a firm grip. Everything does eventually link up, but all the same you'd better not blink too often as the movie plays out: if you do, you'll be lost when the final credits role.
The film is also plagued by a lot of hand-held-camera cinematography, presumably in order to convey the drug-laden atmosphere through which the characters move; there are also quite a few graphics, split screens, and so on. I find that a little of this goes quite a long way, and between the camera tricks and the constant shifts WONDERLAND looses focus and at times becomes a little wearing.
Even so, WONDERLAND still manages to be an interesting film, the sort of film that you wish had been undertaken by a great artist instead of director and co-writer James Cox, who would be most gracefully described as somewhat unpolished. There are at least two DVD issues of the film, one that is the film alone, another which also includes a documentary on John Holmes that is actually more interesting than the movie itself; if you have to pick between the two, go with the latter. Recommended, just don't expect too much.
GFT, Amazon Reviewer
A wild ride but confusing November 22, 2008
Frankie (USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
It was an interesting movie but If I didnt know so much about the subject matter I would have been lost in all the confusing back and forth scenes from earlier on in the month of July 1981 to a few days later. It was good overall. Liked the music and would like to buy the sound track.
 Mediocre September 24, 2008
Cosmoetica (New York, USA)
0 out of 5 found this review helpful
Wonderland is a mediocrity with a poorly written central character. But
De Niro's performance as Max Cady, which could easily have gone over
the top, is the only thing that raises that trite thriller up to
mediocrity. Kilmer's Holmes does not elicit sympathy nor disdain, even
when he pimps his girlfriend Dawn to Nash, and later physically abuses
her. Yet, the scene where De Niro tries to seduce Juliette Lewis's
character still creeps a viewer out even as the written dialogue seems
absurd. THAT'S the difference!
To use a more contemporaneous actor, looking at Guy Pearce from Memento
shows the difference- as well. In Memento and The Salton Sea, both
actors shine, but compare them in lesser vehicles like The Time Machine
and The Saint. Pearce makes his character somewhat sympathetic & a
viewer almost empathizes with the hero of the unbelievable tale. Yet,
in The Saint, Kilmer lacks the suavity of Roger Moore's TV original,
and the role almost descends to parody with Simon Templar as a Lon
Chaney wannabe. He becomes a cartoon figure where Pearce's character
retains its integrity. This is why Kilmer has to be selective in roles
and films he chooses- he has a limited range and only when a role
niches in that role can his greatness shine. This is not so much a
criticism as a recognition, for Kilmer- as an actor- is like the 3
Bears' porridge. When he's in his range he's good- and he's very, very
good, but when he's not he's, well- a cool, tasteless grain-type
cereal.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 105
|
|
|
