| Earthsea |  | Director: Robert Lieberman
Actors: Shawn Ashmore, Kristin Kreuk, Isabella Rossellini, Danny Glover, Sebastian Roché
Category: DVD
Buy New: $14.44
as of 2/9/2010 13:58 EST details
New (4) Used (5) from $8.51
Seller: moviemars
Rating:  141 reviews
Sales Rank: 220634
Format: NTSC
Language: English (Unknown)
Region: 1
UPC: 057373166000
EAN: 0057373166000
ASIN: B000787YUE
Theatrical Release Date: December 13, 2004
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
Originally broadcast as Legend of Earthsea in December 2004, the Sci-Fi Channel's four-hour miniseries of Earthsea rides the coattails of the Lord of the Rings trilogy with its quest-driven story of humble blacksmith Ged (Shawn Ashmore), a wizard-to-be who is mentored by the magical Ogion (Danny Glover) as he seeks to preserve the realm of Earthsea from the evil King Tygath (Sebastian Roché). Ged's adventures lead him to the priestess Tenar (Kristen Kreuk, from Smallville) and with secrets shared by High Priestess Thar (Isabella Rossellini), they gain the power to prevail over Tygath. As presented by Robert Halmi Sr. (producer of Merlin, Gulliver's Travels and several other fantasy miniseries), this skeletal rendering of Earthsea boasts a wealth of digital effects and semi-lavish set design, but Ashmore's lack of charisma hampers a production already fraught with problems. It provoked the wrath of fantasy fans and a firm rejection by author Ursula K. Le Guin, who had watched helplessly (she wasn't involved or consulted) as her classic novels A Wizard of Earthsea and The Tombs of Atuan were racially "whitewashed" (in Le Guin's words) nearly beyond recognition. As TV fantasy goes, Earthsea is admirably ambitious, but best enjoyed by those with no awareness of the classic books it is very loosely based on. --Jeff Shannon
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 141
 WORTHLESS December 29, 2009
Geoffrey Thorne (California, USA)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This is the worst adaptation of a book to film that I have ever seen. it is as if the creators of the film never read the book and, judging it simply by the cover art, set out to make a film that would cause people to hate it. It is so bad, if you sit in on the shelf next to other films it will make them crappier as well. I feel sorry for the actors who had to muddle through this chancre and I feel awful for ANYONE who sees it and thinks it has anything to do with Ms. LeGuin's fantastic work.
There is nothing worth recommending here. Not one thing. It betrays everything the original writer created with her stellar and beautiful series of books. Ignore this film. Ignore it with an ax, repeatedly, until it's not a film anymore. Then go and read the books or listen to the radio adaptation on BBC 7.
This thing is just worthless. Completely worthless.
I would have given it a negative number rating but AMAZON doesn't allow that.
 A coming-of-age story based on a great novel, but got the Hallmark treatment. September 27, 2009
bernie (Arlington, Texas)
Based on a novel by Ursula K/ La Guin, this is one of those fantasy stories with wizards, High Priestess', evil doers and magic. A young up-and-coming wizard, Ged (Shawn Ashmore) and an occasional buddy is tasked with saving their world "Earthsea" from recent bad buys and old evil ones. Meanwhile back at the temple a sister Kossil (Jennifer Calvert) with a nasty attitude and a vile of poison is trying to usurp the High priestess position from Thar (Isabella Rossellini). Will the wizard succeed in his mission? Will the slinky sister fulfill her mission?
Well costumed, fair graphics, contemporary dialog.
Before watching this story you may want to read some of Joseph Campbell's "The Hero with a Thousand Faces"
And if you are a fan of Isabella Rossellini, she has a great series of shorts called "Green Porn" It's all about bugs, fish, and other such creatures.
The Hero with a Thousand Faces (Bollingen Series)
A complete failure even on its own limited terms July 13, 2009
Trevor Willsmer (London, England)
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
Earthsea, Hallmark and the SciFi Channel's very loose adaptation Ursula LeGuin's Wizard of Earthsea and The Tombs of Atuan was preceded by an incredibly bad reputation, and sadly one it richly deserves. Bearing only a passing resemblance to the source material - a young wizard unleashes an evil shadow on the world while showing off his magic - the opening narration about prophecies and amulets serves fair warning that plot has become an identikit Dungeons and Dragons effort so formulaic that most small children could probably dictate the script before they can write or even walk. So little of the novels' philosophy survives, and even less of the characters or the nature of the world LeGuin created (nearly all the characters have suddenly become white-skinned Canucks) that the title seems merely there for branding reasons. Instead we get a low-budget variation on Lord of the Rings (evil warlord seeks forbidden knowledge to rule the world) while the wizards' isle of Roke has magically turned into Hogwarts without the blazers but with the obligatory obnoxious Malfoyesque villain. Worse, the changes are executed with such a visible lack of inspiration or enthusiasm that a good two-and-a-half hours of the three-hour running time feels like treading stagnant water.
As if this weren't bad enough, the film is disastrously cast with some of the most uncharismatic performers available, half of whom ham it up while the other half read their lines as if off a cue card with particularly bad handwriting. Sebastian Roche's pantomime villain deserves special note for his ability to place curious emphasis on the wrong word in every line as if he's lost all interest in every sentence long before reaching the end. Danny Glover and Alan Scarfe fair somewhat better while the prominently billed Amanda Tapping (total screen time: 10 seconds, 5 of them out of focus) doesn't screw up her single line, though "What have you done?" isn't exactly challenging. Throw in terrible direction (mostly tight two shots), uninteresting locations shot in bad weather and derivative scoring and chances are you'll hate it almost as much as LeGuin does.
 Poor Fantasy Fare March 13, 2009
Ana Mardoll (United States)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Earthsea / B00077BPA0
*Spoilers*
I haven't read the Earthsea book that this is based on, although I do own it and intend to read it, even after suffering through this horrible adaptation, because the comments here lead me to believe that the book is far, far better. Fair enough.
Having said that, this was a pretty awful movie. Weighing in at three hours long (apparently this was originally aired in pieces on the Sci-Fi channel), this plodding cliche-ridden movie is a genuinely terrible attempt at fantasy, with only a few bright points of redemption.
To start, the audio in this movie is absolutely terrible and makes the movie unwatchable almost from the beginning. I usually note in my reviews whether a movie is packaged with captions for the hearing impaired, as I generally require captions in order to follow along with the dialogue. Earthsea is not provided with captions, which disappointed me but isn't as unusual as one might think, so I expected to simply rely on my viewing companions for the words I miss. The audio quality is so terrible, however, that even my perfect-hearing boyfriend could not discern what was being said on screen half the time. The opening narration by Glover is so garbled that, even after watching it EIGHT times in a row, all we could make out was " Earthsea Nameless Ones ". The visual effects allowed us to piece together the back story of a nunnery, an amulet, and a sealed door with evil behind it, but that was more to do with clichéd fantasy tropes than decent sound editing. The audio got worse from there - the actors frequently mumble their lines and we were deeply annoyed every time "Sparrowhawk" came out as "Spare-A-Hawk". Enunciation should not be limited to A-list actors.
Too much of the plot is compelled by convenient actions and assumptions that are never explained. The hero and heroine have lifelong visions of one another for no reason other than it facilitates the plot and allows them to "trust one another" immediately in circumstances where they otherwise would not. The timeline is disjointed - with the breaking of the amulet being presented as ancient history (the nuns study pictures of it in their history classes, the people speak distantly of it as 'lost forever', the head magus never expected to look upon it in his lifetime, etc.) and yet the breaking of the amulet turns out to be a relatively recent phenomena because that way the Old Woman At The Beginning can have turned out to be the nun who started it all. Why, then, are people so resigned that the amulet is 'lost forever' when the losing was so recent? Human nature isn't like that - there should be hundred of ne'er-do-wells looking for the darn thing, and why, please, have the sisters never noticed that a large chunk of the thing is embedded in a key they see daily?
I am also baffled by the idea that one would send a powerful young wizard to learn discipline in an academy that clearly exercises no discipline whatsoever over its most unruly members. The murder scene with the serving nun is simply ludicrous - a person does not simply stand there and let themselves be quietly strangled to death without kicking, struggling, or otherwise fighting. And I make a motion that the blatant Bring The Cheery Dead Side-Kick Back To Life cliché be banned from all future fantasy movies. Seriously.
The only thing I really liked about this movie was the idea that the "evil" emotions one carries must be acknowledged as real in order to be a whole person. It's a little too easy these days to go the "anger must never be felt" route these days. I much prefer a philosophy that acknowledges that our anger is simply a part of us and while we shouldn't be controlled by it, neither should we expect to be able expel it entirely. However, I may be giving this movie too much credit in order to say SOMETHING nice about it. Well, here's one other good thing - I liked seeing Isabella Rossellini from "Death Becomes Her" in this movie. Her voice is always lovely and her acting is solid.
I do not own this movie, I rented it from my Blockbuster Online account.
Wizard of Earthsea March 7, 2009
Cecile F. Rbeihat (North Carolina)
0 out of 1 found this review helpful
I teach a ninth grade English class and assigned the novel THE WIZARD OF EARTHSEA. The film actually takes up two of the authors novels so was a little confusing to students but we managed to muddle through and hopefully encouraged several to read the next novel due to the film. The special effects are interesting, the acting a little slow. Not bad to give a visual for kids.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 141
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
Proud member of the Celebrity Pro Network. Make sure you check out these other great CelebrityPro network sites:
Lyrics Database
Celebrity Blog
Celebrity Thing
Celebrity PC
Latest Celebrity Photos
Portal
Travel Photos
Quotes
Flash Games
|
Is there a better
price available?
Find out:
|
|
|
|
