| The Other Boleyn Girl | 
 enlarge | Actor: Natalie Portman
Studio: Sony Pictures
Category: DVD
List Price: $19.94
Buy Used: $5.99
You Save: $13.95 (70%)
New (56) Used (47) Collectible (3) from $5.99
Avg. Customer Rating:  168 reviews
Sales Rank: 713
Format: Ac-3, Color, Dolby, Dubbed, Dvd-video, Subtitled, Widescreen, Ntsc
Languages: English (Original Language), English (Unknown), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled), French (Subtitled), French (Dubbed), Spanish (Dubbed)
Rating: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Number Of Items: 1
Running Time: 115
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.3
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.3 x 0.5
MPN: COLD21450D
UPC: 043396214507
EAN: 0043396214507
ASIN: B0012QE4Q2
Theatrical Release Date: February 29, 2008
Release Date: June 10, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: Ships Within 24 Hours - Satisfaction Guaranteed!
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Two sisters contend for the affection of king henry viii. Studio: Sony Pictures Home Ent Release Date: 11/25/2008 Starring: Natalie Portman Eric Bana Run time: 115 minutes Rating: Pg13 Director: Justin Chadwick
Amazon.com
A tale of two sisters competing for the same king, The Other Boleyn Girl uses historical facts as window dressing for this work of fiction that is entertaining, if not wholly believable. Anne Boleyn (Natalie Portman) is the doe-eyed vixen ordered by her power-hungry uncle to bewitch King Henry VIII (Eric Bana). Her shy sister Mary (Scarlett Johansson) has always been in Anne's shadow; Anne is prettier, more accomplished, and desired by many men. So when the King picks Mary--the "other Boleyn girl"--as his mistress, Anne turns on her sister and schemes to become not only the King's consort, but his new queen. With a pair of American actresses in the lead roles and an Aussie portraying their hunky object of desire, the English accents are all over the place in this period piece with a modern feel. Though the Boleyn girls' mother points out that her "daughters are being traded like cattle for the advancement of men," it is Anne who ultimately throws her slight weight around to bully Henry into doing her bidding. When he begs her to give herself to him, Anne--wearing a Carrie Bradshaw-esque "B" pendant on her neck--counters, "Make me your Queen." Is the audience really supposed to believe that Henry the VIII--the most powerful man in the land--would divorce Catherine of Aragon, separate from the Catholic church, and put England in upheaval simply because Anne refused to sleep with him until he jumped through all her hoops? "I have torn this country apart for you," he hisses at her before finally getting his way. Based on Philippa Gregory's bestselling novel of the same name, The Other Boleyn Girl features an attractive cast and a familiar plot with some icky twists. Kieran McGuigan's cinematography is breathtaking and is as crucial to setting the film's tone as the dialogue. Actually, it fares better: Lines such as "Well? Did he have you?!" sound almost comical. But the sweeping shots of Henry's kingdom and the carefully framed close-ups of Portman and Johansson are breathtaking in their beauty and say what words simply cannot. --Jae-Ha Kim Get to Know the Cast of The Other Boleyn Girl
(click on images to see more films from each actor) 
Natalie Portman (Anne Boleyn) | 
Scarlett Johansson (Mary Boleyn) |
| | 
Eric Bana (Henry Tudor) | 
Jim Sturgess (George Boleyn) | 
Kristin Scott Thomas (Lady Elizabeth Boleyn) |
Beyond The Other Boleyn Girl 
Paperback Book | 
On Blu-ray | 
The Soundtrack | Stills from The Other Boleyn Girl (click for larger image)
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 163 more reviews...
 The Other Boleyn Girl November 22, 2008
This was a wonderful film. Very true, historically. Well acted. Authentic costumes. Good character development. Well done!
 A passionate and complex film. November 20, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
This is a beautifully acted, scripted, and directed period film.
I know there are a number of inaccuracies regarding the historical elements in this film, but that's to be expected from Hollywood. I found the story riveting, the performances strong and convincing, and the plot, whether inaccurate or not, very believable and rather very likely.
It is something of a revisionist's version of what had happened in King Henry VIII's reign in that Anne Boleyn was one of the most hated women in British history and often considered/described as the stereotypical gold digger, but I have always felt there was much more to the story than the tidbits of the bias history presented about her. This tale presents a very different view of Anne Boleyn, brilliantly portrayed by Natalie Portman of Star Wars Prequel Trilogy fame, who seems more a victim of her family's quest for power and influence which, quite frankly, would be a far more likely scenario than the concept of the independent, crafty gold digger that history seems to constantly portray her as. Sometimes a revisionist notion of history can seriously provide a more likely reality and I think this version does that. It was not unheard of for men in power to pimp their daughters out to their own advantage.
Eric Bana makes a very convincing King Henry VIII and is perhaps one of the few who make him out to be something considerably more than the monster history seems to make him out to be. It is still an unflinching, negative, self-serving, egotistical King Henry we all have come to know from history books, but Bana creates a more complex, tormented Henry that makes him more round and believable.
History seems to have him very much in love with his first wife Catherine, but hurt and disgusted that she could not produce a male heir for him. When charmed by Anne either through her own covert actions or by her family's considerable influence, or some combination of both, Henry pretty much goes nuts in an effort to gain Anne and a male heir to his throne. Men have gone nuts over women over far less, so what makes this scenario so hard to believe? I, for one, think it is very likely that this is exactly what led up to his "divorce" of Catherine and war with the Catholic Church.
Sadly, this put Anne at a disadvantage from the start and was a source of trouble between her and Henry right from the get go. Some argue that Anne and Henry's relationship declined slowly over time, but I attest that their marriage was contentious from the start due to the fact Henry ripped apart a nation over Anne, who was soundly rejected by the people, couldn't produce a male heir after numerous attempts, and was executed by Henry after just barely three years as his wife on what was most likely trumped up charges. Heck, they didn't call her "Anne of a thousand days" for nothing.
The "other" Boleyn girl is played with great subtly and inner strength by Scarlett Johansson who completely disappears into this role. I simply found it hard to recognize her from some of her other films like The Island and Match Point. It wasn't the make up or British accent so much as to the fact she was a completely different person in this film. She is terrifically understated here.
All other cast members are excellent as is the script, cinematography, set designs, music, and direction. This is a solidly made film, but it isn't perfect and it won't please everyone, as some will be offended by the historical "guesses" that take place. Well, regardless of the accuracies or inaccuracies of this historical period and these pivotal players in it, this film is extremely entertaining.
Nice movie, not historically accurate November 13, 2008
I was so happy when this came out on film because I loved the book. The book this movie is based on is historical fiction so I knew it was not going to be historically accurate but this movie does take some facts and stretch them pretty far. So if your looking to learn something about Anne Boleyn don't go to this movie. But this movie is very entertaining and the costumes are perfect. You did get a sense of what it was like during that time period and what the two girls went through. There are some nice special features as well. Yes, this movie is historically inaccurate, but all movies are unless they are a documentary. So if you keep in mind this is a movie to ENTERTAIN you, then you will enjoy it. Natalie Portman does a great job as Anne Boleyn.
 Off with her head !!! November 4, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
What a terrible film. Can someone please tell Natalie Portman that her 15 minutes were over a long time ago. Why does she keep trying the horrible fake British accent? It's almost as bad as Madonna's .... almost! And her acting, well it's about as bad as the accent. Scarlett Johansson isn't much better. Both of them are so out of their element it's frightening. As for the film, it's a total mess. It blows so fast through the historical events that you don't care one iota about any of the characters except maybe for the poor British actors in the film who had to go to their trailers every day and bang their heads against the wall trying to figure out how to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.
Ambitiojs epic--not quite there October 30, 2008
Not an art movie--not quite an epic--but a regular costumer, in what has become a culture with Focus Films: Make as many movies about Elizabeth I, or her relatives and historical milieu. This time it is about her mother, Ann Boleyn, but the story--slow moving at first--let's us know about her younger sister, Mary, and her manipulative uncle, the Duke of Norfolk, who sees it is an opportunity to further his family's interests by promoting her as the prospective mistress of his king, who else, the infamous Henry the VIII. She is married already, and that makes it easier, for the king need not bother with her virginhood. Mary has a child with Henry and then is abandoned; his interest now turns to her sister, Ann, who had been in France a while, "educating" herself in court manners. Now she is a daring woman who has the temerity to exchange witticism with the mighty king. She defies him to marry her, something that will cost England a rift with the Pope. All this is well known stuff of history, and the movie does not bother with much detail. But when Ann seems to go too far, fails to produce a male heir, and thence is beheaded; that simple. The details of two beheadings, for she has to be found guilty of something--incest with her brother--are gruesome, and both she and her brother undergo the usual decapitation process, he with an ax, his head on a block, she by a horizontal hit with a blade that cuts off her head while she knees, and her head and neck are in vertical position.
Eric Bana, who plays Henry, makes an effort to make this male monster's tale sympathetic--after all he has to have a son!--but, in this one of his weakest performances, only succeeds in giving the viewer a bag of inconsistencies, for Henry seems beyond redemption--whatever his reasons. Natalie Portman and Scarlet Johanssen give creditable performances, and the rest of the cast is on the excellent side, in this tale which nothing but a repetition of royal sins and monstrous inhumanities.
|
|
|
