My Bloody Valentine 3D (2-disc special edition) |  | Actors: Jensen Ackles, Jaime King Studio: Lionsgate Category: DVD
List Price: $34.98 Buy New: $4.69 as of 2/9/2010 22:27 EST details You Save: $30.29 (87%)
New (36) Used (22) Collectible (1) from $3.23
Seller: mirmedia_movies_and_music Rating: 103 reviews Sales Rank: 6843
Format: AC-3, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DTS Surround Sound, DVD, Special Edition, Subtitled, 3D, Widescreen, NTSC Languages: English (Original Language), English (Unknown), English (Subtitled), Spanish (Subtitled) Rating: R (Restricted) Region: 1 Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 Number Of Discs: 1 Running Time: 101 Minutes Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.2 Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5.4 x 0.7
MPN: 25478 UPC: 031398109518 EAN: 0031398109518 ASIN: B001OQCVH4
Theatrical Release Date: 2009 Release Date: May 19, 2009 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Though never a landmark in the slasher subgenre, the Canadian-made My Bloody Valentine (1981) was a favorite among gorehounds for its plentiful scenes of bloodshed; the 2009 remake sticks closely to the original in this respect, and ups the gross factor by rendering many of them in impressive 3-D. The core plot, penned by Todd Farmer and Zane Smith, remains essentially the same--a series of gruesome murders appears to be linked to a terrible mine accident from two decades ago--but just as with the original, it's largely just a framework on which to string the carnage set pieces, which are splattery enough to please even the most jaded Saw or Hostel fanatic. The Real-D effects deliver the required degree of heart-stopping jumps without the usual eye strain, and if one can snicker away old standbys like a tree branch crashing through a windshield, one has to admire the chutzpah of presenting actress Betsey Rue's pursuit of a wayward bed partner while fully naked and toting a shotgun in full and vibrant 3-D, moments before the pickaxe-wielding killer descends upon her. Rue's scenery-chewing performance is the best of the twenty-something cast, which is led by Supernatural's Jensen Ackles and Jaime King; character actors Kevin Tighe and Tom Atkins deliver their moments like the old pros they are. Though by no means a new horror classic, My Bloody Valentine 3-D sets the gross-out bar for all future slasher remakes to surpass. -- Paul Gaita
Product Description Studio: Lions Gate Home Ent. Release Date: 05/19/2009 Run time: 103 minutes Rating: R
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 103
More fun than a pick-axe in the face! January 19, 2010 JJ LoveBeast (The House Beside the Last House on the Edge of Dead End Park) Old-school, blood n' boobs slasher thrills meets sexy, new-age 3-D technology in one of the most entertaining theatrical experiences I've had in ages.
The 3-D may not be as effective in the home, but even as a 2-D feature, this one is a lot of goofy, gore-soaked, guilty fun that harkens back to the glory days of body-count slash-a-thons.
More remakes should be made with this degree of respect for the source material.
I Wish No Stars Was An Option... January 18, 2010 Sean Stark (Denver, CO United States) 0 out of 2 found this review helpful
This is hands down the absolute worst piece of crap movie I have ever seen...and believe me I have seen a lot of bad films in my time. There is about 3-5 minutes of this movie that are even worth watching and about 3 of those are a fully naked girl running around. (What can I say, that part was enjoyable to watch). If that's not your thing, well, I can't say there's much worth watching except a few super gory shots here and there. Of course, that does not excuse the audacity this film has to suck in new ways and inconceivable ways. Seriously though, there is absolutely nothing good I can say about this movie. The plot is god awful and makes NO sense whatsoever. The majority of the "talent" in the movie are clearly only to make young teenagers swoon by their good looks, the rest must have fallen on hard times and will do anything for a paycheck. I think the makers/distributors of this film assume the viewer is so stupid and shallow they will not even care if it follows any logic because hey, there's some hotties in it! (Shame on you, Lionsgate). Apparently that's what this genre is being reduced to though. Sad times. Please, save yourself some brain cells and avoid this stinker like the plague. I wish I had known before it was too late.
PS The 3-D sucks, the lines are off in every other shot and I finally just switched to regular ol' 2-D.
I Wish No Stars Was An Option... This is hands down the absolute worst piece of crap movie I have ever seen...and believe me I have seen a lot of bad films in my time. There is about 3-5 minutes of this movie that are even worth watching and about 3 of those are a fully naked girl running around. (What can I say, that part was enjoyable to watch). If that's not your thing, well, I can't say there's much worth watching except a few super gory shots here and there. Of course, that does not excuse the audacity this film has to suck in new ways and inconceivable ways. Seriously though, there is absolutely nothing good I can say about this movie. The plot is god awful and makes NO sense whatsoever. The majority of the "talent" in the movie are clearly only to make young teenagers swoon by their good looks, the rest must have fallen on hard times and will do anything for a paycheck. I think the makers/distributors of this film assume the viewer is so stupid and shallow they will not even care if it follows any logic because hey, there's some hotties in it! (Shame on you, Lionsgate). Apparently that's what this genre is being reduced to though. Sad times. Please, save yourself some brain cells and avoid this stinker like the plague. I wish I had known before it was too late.
PS The 3-D sucks, the lines are off in every other shot and I finally just switched to regular ol' 2-D.
clear rating
better than the original December 26, 2009 horror fan (U.S.) I never thought much of the original other than it was a typical cookie-cutter slasher flick, so when I saw the remake, I wasn't expecting much at all. Well, aside from the ending (which I won't spoil) I loved this flick. It was a throwback to '80s slashers. It had great gore, female nudity, and lots of action. I recommend this movie to any '80s slasher fan.
Excellent 3D on your HD TV December 17, 2009 rehabber (Cut & Shoot, TX) One reviewer said there was not any big names in this movie..SORRY but Jensen Ackles from Supernatural is plenty big enough for me. I was truly amazed at the quality of 3D, never thought I would live long enough to see this on a TV. Several people have watched it and I love watching them dodge the pickax..fun. Now I need to find more 3D BD movies. I am going to see Avatar and hope it comes out in 3D BD. If I was just giving a rating on the 3D quality it would have gotten 5 stars, but as a movie in general just a 3, so I split the difference and give it a 4.
At Least the 3D was Cool December 8, 2009 Inept Editor (New York, NY) 0 out of 1 found this review helpful
Not since Friday the 13th Part 3 have I remembered so vividly a 3D horror movie. Now, with the release of a My Bloody Valentine remake in 3D, Lionsgate raises the bar, at least in production value.
When I first heard that My Bloody Valentine was being refilmed, I thought to myself, "Huh?" I had never seen the original, so it took a bit of research to find out what the movie was all about.
Apparently in the original , directed by George Mihalka, a disgruntled miner named Harry Warden(played by Peter Cowper) goes on a killing spree, killing fellow miners by cutting out their hearts. Cutting to present day, a group of teenagers get the bright idea to hold a Valentine's Day party in the mine where the murders took place. It proves to be a fantastic idea, as the party-goers are dispatched one by one. Is Harry Warden back from the dead with his trusty miner's helmet? Possibly. The movie was reminiscient of those good old 80s slasher movies that we all loved. It was filmed in Canada(how about those Canucks?), and had 19 minutes of edited footage that was cut due to excessive gore, which was only included recently in a re-release by Lionsgate.
Now, Harry Warden is back. AGAIN. Lionsgate revisited the sleepy mining town of terror by recreating the movie, but this time in 3D. And that is where the story goes bad.
The original storyline is well intact. We have the flashback of Harry Warden(now played by Rich Walters) going crazy in a hospital a year after the original mining incident, which we never see but are told was a "mining accident". We also don't know why he started killing everybody. We can only guess it has to do with some workers union disagreement. What we do know is that he returns to the mines after leaving the hospital, and happens on a group of teenagers who got the bright idea to hold a Valentine's Day party in the mine where the accident took place. After dispatching many of the teenagers, Harry Warden attacks Tom Hanniger(played by Jensen Ackles), but is held off by the police, who apparently shoot and kill Warden, and Tom is left a gibbering idiot.
Ten years later, Tom Hanniger returns to take over the mining company after the death of his father(this fact was left out until now) after being in a mental institution. When he arrives, murders begin. Is Harry Warden back from the dead? Probably. Slasher stars never stay down for long(see Jason Voorhees, Freddy Kreuger, Michael Myers, etc.). The town thinks Tom is responsible. Tom isn't so sure(obviously.) The hunt ensues to uncover the truth, before the whole town ends up dead, or the mine is sold to Germans.
The Good: My Bloody Valentine is brutal in the gore factor. It's in 3D, and not like Friday the 13th Part 3. The theater gave us these big Buddy Holly glasses, and I'm glad I kept mine on. When a woman gets half her head severed with a shovel, and the 3D has the head slide forward at you, that's good use of 3D. When a miner throws a pick-axe from fifty yards away straight at the audience, and it sticks into a car's windshield, that's good use of 3D. This movie played the 3D card for every grisly scene, as well as they should. There wasn't much else holding this movie together. Besides the drunken old men playing caricatures of old mining men.
The Bad: Everything else. The storyline was annoyingly vague, which doesn't work too well with a basic slasher movie. It's as if the movie is meant to be watched after seeing the original to get the storyline straight. I hadn't seen the original at the time, so I was stuck. The twist ending made me, and half the theater, throw up their arms in anguish, since it wasn't suspenseful so much as, "So wait, why did this all happen?" Granted, it's a slasher movie, but usually a storyline of "killer on the loose" doesn't have so many scenes that you look back on and scratch your head about.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 103
|
|
|