|
Lathe of Heaven | 
| Director: Philip Haas
Actors: James Caan, Lukas Haas, Lisa Bonet, David Strathairn, Sheila Mccarthy
Studio: A&E Home Video
Category: DVD
List Price: $19.95
Buy New: $1.98
You Save: $17.97 (90%)
New (38) Used (15) Collectible (1) from $1.69
Rating:  47 reviews
Sales Rank: 66134
Format: Color, Dvd-video, Letterboxed, Ntsc
Language: English (Original Language)
Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Region: 1
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Number Of Discs: 1
Running Time: 104 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.2
Dimensions (in): 7.5 x 5 x 0.6
ISBN: 0767043979
UPC: 733961704099
EAN: 9780767043977
ASIN: B00006JDQN
Theatrical Release Date: September 8, 2002
Release Date: October 29, 2002
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Shipping: International shipping available
Condition: Still factory sealed! - Ships within 24 hours! - Thanks!
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com
For Ursula Le Guin's devoted following, the 2002 remake of the 1980 film based on her novel may not be the stuff dreams are made of. This new adaptation omits some of the original's most memorable developments (the racially equalized "grays" and the alien invasion). Lucas Haas stars as George Orr, a "little lost boy" haunted by his dreams, which, he claims, alter the present unbeknownst to anyone but him. James Caan (more menacing than was Kevin Conway in the original) costars as the self-promoting Dr. Haber, the therapist assigned to treat the suicidal young man. This "very productive relationship" most benefits Haber, who attempts to manufacture George's dreams "to fit some useful function." The requisite unforeseen consequences ensue. Lisa Bonet is ravishing, but less impressive as George's skeptical public defender who may be the girl of his dreams. The foreboding mood is enhanced by Angelo Badalamenti's score, which recalls his haunting work on Twin Peaks. --Donald Liebenson
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 42 more reviews...
 Ridiculous September 21, 2008
mm32
This movie has very little in common with the novel. It's like the adapters read the summary on the back of the LeGuin novel book jacket and decided that was all they needed to do to write the screenplay. I bought this for $3.99 as a previously viewed DVD at Blockbuster and I can definitely see why they were removing it from their stock. Do not waste your money on this piece of s**t. I haven't seen the 1980 version, but I definitely plan on seeking it out just to get the rancid taste of this film out of my mouth.
You have been warned - this movie is for completists only July 9, 2008
Interested Observer (Battle Creek, MI)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
If you want to see, enjoy and appreciate the marvelous story Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Lequin then either read the book or watch the 1980 film production. Either option will give you the inestimatable advantage of a presentation of the story, its underlying ideas and its characters. The film version also treats you to excellent performances that present actual characters from the novel, in character and all the essential details and concepts of the author's excellent novel with a no worse than merely adequate visual realization that belies the budget contraints of the production.
The version reviewed here dispenses with most of that annoying and pedantic fidelity to the author's work and in return gives you ... James Caan. That is about it. There is a stray mention of effective dreams and other coincidental relationships to the original work, but that is about it. What I believe to be the ultimate discovery that breaks Dr. Haber in the end is completely absent as are most of the key episodes and consequences of Dr. Haber's study of George Orr and his effective dreams.
If this were the ONLY version on film it would still be a dismal failure. Poor adaptations of novels, especially novels with highly intellectual content, are a commonplace. But there is another film version that is excellent in writing and acting, and looks good despite its budget.
A handful of favorable reviews (there IS a reason for the paucity of them) seek to justify this misshapen effort's existence on "its own merits". A movie that uses the title and reputation of a well known work, especially one that has been produced in the same medium before, does not get the luxury of being only evaluated in a vacuum by the ignorant. It must either present a worthy rendering of that work, or present a "re-visioning" (1) of such merit that the changes made are well justified. This production does neither and the effects are no great shakes either. This thing compares to the real thing about like a new production of Hamlet, still using Shakespeare's name, set in a gay bathhouse using maybe three lines of the original script compares to a production of Shakespeare's Hamlet.
You have been warned, this thing is for completists only.
==================
(1) "re-visioning" n. Euphemism for a director's ego in place of good writing combined with a big, big CGI budget and a usually a huge promotion before release aimed at a public that does not give a rodential back end about anything but action, effects and hot boys or babes in (or out) of tight costumes.
 Impossible made plausible: book to film January 3, 2008
Toni Mulholland (Illinois, USA)
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
I have read.....and reread the book, and have seen the 1980 film version. The 1980 version did not so much disappoint: I 'knew' the book could not be done in film. I was awed that anyone would try.
This version dazzled me. It made it look easy.
I suggest strongly that you not try to assess the film until and unless you've read the book.
And do so!
It is an extraordinary work. Any attempt to distill it must fail.
Measuring this film against other SciFi films....and I love sci-fi films...is a disservice.
Read the book. Then watch the film. Both are great pleasures.
Has anyone thought to ask Ursula K. Le Guin what SHE thinks of the films? I would love to know.
For thinking, not just entertaining October 28, 2006
Green-Gene (Snohomish, WA United States)
3 out of 5 found this review helpful
LeGuin's story of a young man who claims his dreams alter reality and the psychiatrist who finally believes him prompts watchers to ask some weighty questions. How do we know what is? What power do we have to change what is, and should we change it? Should we use another individual to make these changes? What do we lose in these changes? What is worth keeping?
I agree with other reviewers who say this movie appeals to the thinkers. This is the kind of film that stamps an archetype in one's mind; one finds oneself comparing other plots to the Lathe of Heaven.
If you want ninety minutes fistfights, car chases, cursin', and killin', you'll be dissappointed by this film. If you enjoy films that play with your concept of reality (e.g. Matrix, The Visitors), you may enjoy this film.
A Personal Favorite April 26, 2006
C. C. Evans (Chicago, IL USA)
6 out of 10 found this review helpful
For once I must disagree with some of Amazon's top reviewers (a rare occasion). This version of "The Lathe of Heaven" stands alone from the book (you don't need to read the book to understand the movie). The characters and plot are deep and moving. Due to the depth and development of the mood it is slow at times, but it never becomes dull. It is original, refreshing and a touching love story runs as an uplifiting undercurrent. Even those who don't like Science Fiction, or don't "get" the book will enjoy this film.
|
|
|
Proud member of the Celebrity Pro Network. Make sure you check out these other great CelebrityPro network sites:
Lyrics Database
Celebrity Blog
Celebrity Thing
Celebrity PC
Latest Celebrity Photos
Portal
Travel Photos
Quotes
Flash Games
|
Is there a better
price available?
Find out:
|
|
|
|
